Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts

Sunday, March 19, 2017

The Scariest Thing About Trump Is That We’ve Still Got No Way Of Replacing Him In 2020





Caitlin Johnstone
March 20, 2017

"It’s time to start turning around and facing your captors, progressives. The ruling elites of your party don’t fear Trump, they fear you. They fear you discovering your true power and coming together to demand that they start working for you instead of the oligarchs. A true progressive takeover of American politics would transform the entire world into something sane and beautiful and bring health and harmony to all of humanity. We can have this. There are people whose job it is to keep you from seeing this, but we can. Stop placing your trust in the ruling Democratic elites who’ve been exploiting your for money and votes, stop listening to their corporate media mouthpieces who get paid millions of dollars a year to lie to you, and stop accepting anything other than complete and total loyalty to you and your wellbeing from the people who have the great privilege of governing your nation."

[READ MORE]

Saturday, February 25, 2017

What do you call it when you do the same thing over and over and expect different results? Oh yeah, the democratic party. 
-- Naomi Klein



Current Affairs/February 25, 2017

THEY MUST BE TRYING TO FAIL

By failing to appoint Keith Ellison to chair the DNC, Democrats have written their suicide note…




At this point, one has to conclude that the national Democratic Party has a death wish. Given the opportunity to throw a minuscule bone to the Sanders progressives, the DNC declined. By giving its chairmanship to former Labor Secretary Tom Perez, instead of Rep. Keith Ellison, party leaders have shown that they must be actively desiring electoral oblivion.


The Ellison/Perez fight had been portrayed as a re-litigation of the Sanders/Clinton primary fight. It was and it wasn’t. It was, in that Keith Ellison was endorsed by Bernie Sanders, while Tom Perez had the backing of members of the party’s more traditional establishment. But that’s also an oversimplification. After all, Chuck Schumer, not exactly a socialist insurgent, had endorsed Ellison, and the political differences between Ellison and Perez were not nearly so obvious as those between Sanders and Clinton. (READ MORE)

Saturday, February 18, 2017

The Did-You-Talk-to-Russians Witch Hunt


When it comes to trying to take Trump down, by this point it would seem he has provided plenty of substantial grounds even in three short weeks. However the MSM and the Deep State are concentrating on pushing the story of a connection with Russia, which allows them to kill three birds with one stone:

1) It delegitimizes the Trump presidency.
2) Shifts the blame for Clinton's loss away from the candidate and the party.
3) Opens the door for war with Russia, which Deep State seems so eager for.

Do read Robert Parry's cautions below, where he carefully puts the relationship between the US and Russia into perspective. 

But then I'm reminded that when Hillary was Secretary of State, the Clintons were connected with the sale of a company, Uranium One, which gave the Russians control of 20% of all US uranium production capacity. Because uranium is a “strategic asset, with implications for national security” the sale required oversight by the State Department. Then shortly before the sale, Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock. Further, Uranium One’s chairman gave $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation, a contribution that was not revealed despite Hillary’s agreement with Obama to identify all donors. Not that I approve of anything Trump does, but this makes vague revelations of his associates’ phone calls to unidentified Russian personages look like small potatoes indeed.



Democrats, liberals and media pundits – in their rush to take down President Trump – are pushing a New McCarthyism aimed at Americans who have talked to Russians, risking a new witch hunt.

By Robert Parry/Consortiumnews.com consortiumnews.com 2/18/17

In the anti-Russian frenzy sweeping American politics and media, Democrats, liberals and mainstream pundits are calling for an investigative body that could become a new kind of House Un-American Activities Committee to hunt down Americans who have communicated with Russians. The proposed commission would have broad subpoena powers to investigate alleged connections between Trump’s supporters and the Russian government with the apparent goal of asking if they now have or have ever talked to a Russian who might have some tie to the Kremlin or its intelligence agencies.

Such an admission apparently would be prima facie evidence of disloyalty, a guilt-by-association “crime” on par with Sen. Joe McCarthy’s Cold War pursuit of “communists” who supposedly had infiltrated the U.S. government, the film industry and other American institutions..(READ MORE)


Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal--New York Times, 4/24/15

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one...(READ MORE)


Sunday, February 12, 2017

Loving and Hating for the Wrong Reasons

Since I can’t think of any reason NOT to hate DT, perhaps this article should be retitled, “Did we love Barack Obama for the wrong reasons?”
Because, as the article points out, the actual policies of each are not that different. The style, however, is, which makes me think that, more than anything, this election has been about class: Us, the polished, well-spoken, college-educated elite, versus Them, the rough, uneducated, uncouth Other. They hate us because, frankly, we look down on them and they know it; calling them “deplorables” was the final straw.
We loved Obama because he reflected qualities we felt comfortable with and wanted for ourselves, and most of us, including me, went to sleep for the greater part of his administration, secure in the assumption that “Dad” was taking care of things in the best possible way. We were somehow able to overlook the interventionist wars, droning of hospitals, weddings, and funerals (oops!), loss of habeas corpus (the foundation, really, of the Constitution), treatment of whistle-blowers, deportations, militarized police, police violence, surveillance, etc. because, they say, he didn’t have control over those things and besides, look at Obamacare and LGBT rights. And he’s elegant, intelligent, and has a lovely family.
My friends adore Hillary Clinton for the same reasons – they identify with her. The women of my age (and class) fought the same fight against the patriarchy; we know what it feels like to be highly-educated, take shit from white male superiors, and have to claw your way up. So, when I mention, say, Clinton’s close association with Henry Kissinger, who is generally considered a war criminal, my friends say, “Well she’s flawed.” Yet can you imagine the outrage if Trump were to take on Kissinger as a foreign policy advisor? Yikes!
I think the same was true of the Bernie/Hillary divide. My friends who loved Hillary and hated Bernie (although would have ultimately voted for him) were constantly dumping on his style, his voice, his age (although he appeared to have more energy than 10 millennials) and how he reminded them of their old Jewish uncle. They didn’t want someone who travels in coach (in the middle seat, yet) because that’s not what they aspire to. It wasn’t that he was too idealistic (they would have accepted that from a Jack Kennedy) but his style grated on them. Too straightforward. No polish.
And that’s exactly why Bernie was able to cross party lines and appeal to independents and moderate Republicans, because, besides his obvious integrity (“trustworthiness” having been a big issue in this election), he doesn’t act like he’s better than anyone else but is someone with whom, if he were campaigning at your county fair, you could walk up to and shake hands.
So, what’s the answer? Get off the personalities! Stop it with the Trump caricatures, cartoons, jokes about his hair, gold drapes, and impersonations, because by doing so you’re also insulting a wider group, or at least they could take it that way. Put the emphasis of our protests on specific issues where we can come together, because all of us want health care, jobs, a workable infrastructure, a sustainable environmental future, and an end to the continuous fucking wars that are eating all our money.
We could even carry American flags – no reason why the right should entirely co-opt that symbol – to show that we’re working for more than just our own elite selves, but in the national interest. (I couldn’t carry one, but I’d be fine with it if you did.)
Since we’ve got Trump, I'm hoping that his function is to shine a light on policies which, by being promulgated by the Other, are revealed in their full malevolence, causing those who think of themselves as liberal to finally take action against them.
I believe we can all be brought together, but whether the best way is through a reformed Democratic party or a new third people’s party, remains to be seen. Checking our attitudes, however, is one of the first steps.




The Uncomfortable Truth: Are We Hating Donald Trump for the Wrong Reasons? 


The hypocrisy of criticizing Trump on the axiomatic assumption that that the war makers who preceded him were peacemakers is simply too much to bear.
Ifear that many of us are hating Donald Trump for the wrong reasons.
Multitudes are being swayed by mainstream media-inspired demonization of the new US president based on selective assumptions and half-truths.
The US mainstream media, which rarely deviates from supporting the American government’s conduct, however reckless, is now presenting Trump as if an aberration of otherwise egalitarian, sensible, and peace-loving US policies at home and abroad.
Trump may be described with all the demeaning terminology that one’s livid imagination can muster: evil, wicked, tyrannical, misogynist, war-mongering, rich buffoon, ‘insulting our allies’, infatuating with ‘dictators’, etc.
But do not miss the point.
If you chant in the street: ‘I am with her’, with reference to the defeated Democratic presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton, it means that you are entirely missing the point.
To reminisce about the days of Barack Obama, his oratory skills, clean diplomacy and model, ‘relatable’ family, means that you have bought into the mass deception, the intellectual demagoguery, stifling group-think that pushed us to these extremes, in the first place.
And, within this context, ‘missing the point’, can be quite dangerous, even deadly....(READ MORE)